|
Muslims protected Christian churches in the lands they
occupied from being harmed. In a letter to Simeon, the Archbishop of
Rifardashir and leader of all the bishops of Persia, the Nestorian Patriarch
Geoff III wrote:
‘The Arabs, to whom God has given power over the whole
world, know how wealthy you are, for they live among you. In spite of this,
they do not assail the Christian creed. To the contrary, they have sympathy
with our religion, and venerate our priests and saints of our Lord, and they
graciously donate to our churches and monasteries.’
One of the Muslims caliphs, Abdul-Malik, took the Church of John from the Christians and made it part of a mosque. When Umar bin Abdulaziz
succeeded him as the new Caliph, the Christians complained to him about what
his predecessor had done to their church. Umar wrote to the governor that the
portion of the mosque that was rightfully theirs be returned to them if they
were unable to agree with the governor on a monetary settlement that would
satisfy them.
The Wailing Wall in Jerusalem is known to historians to
be the one of the holiest places of worship in Judaism. Some time ago, it was
completely buried under rubble and heaps of debris. When the Ottoman caliph
Sultan Sulayman came to know of this, he ordered his governor in Jerusalem to
remove all the rubble and debris, clean the area, restore the Wailing Wall, and
make it accessible for Jews to visit.
Unbiased Western historians acknowledge these facts. LeBon
writes:
‘The tolerance of Muhammad towards the Jews and
Christians was truly grand; the founders of other religions that appeared
before him, Judaism and Christianity in particular, did not prescribe such
goodwill. His caliphs followed the same policy, and his tolerance has been
acknowledged by skeptics and believers alike when they study the history of the
Arabs in depth.’
Robertson wrote:
‘The Muslims alone were able to integrate their zeal for
their own religion with tolerance for followers of other religions. Even when
they bore swords into battle for freedom for their religion to spread, they
left those who did not desire it free to adhere to their own religious
teachings.’
Sir Thomas Arnold, an English Orientalist, wrote:
‘We never heard of a report of any planned attempt to
compel non-Muslim minorities to accept Islam, or any organized persecution
aimed at uprooting the Christian religion. If any of the caliphs had chosen
any of these policies, they would have overwhelmed Christianity with the same
ease with which Ferdinand and Isabella exiled Islam from Spain, or with which Louis XIV made following Protestantism a punishable crime in France, or with which the Jews were exiled from England for 350 years. A that time Eastern churches
were completely isolated from the rest of the Christian world. They had no
supporters in the world as they were considered heretical sects of Christianity.
Their very existence to this day is the strongest evidence of the policy of
Islamic government’s tolerance towards them.’
The American author, Lothrop Stoddard wrote, ‘The caliph
Umar took the utmost care to tend to the sanctity of the Christian holy places,
and those who became caliph after him followed his footsteps. They did not
harass the many denominations of pilgrims who came annually from every corner
of the Christian world to visit Jerusalem.’
The reality is that non-Muslims were treated with more
tolerance among the Muslims than anything they experienced with other sects of
their own religion. Richard Stebbins spoke of the Christian experience under
the rule of the Turks:
‘They
(the Turks) allowed all of them, Roman Catholics and Greek Orthodox, to
preserve their religion and follow their consciences as they chose: they
allowed them their churches to perform their sacred rituals in Constantinople and many other places. This is in contrast to what I can testify to from
living in Spain for twelve years; not only were we forced to attend their
Papist celebrations, but our lives and the lives of our grandchildren were in
danger also.’
Thomas Arnold mentions in his ‘Invitation to Islam’ that
there were many people in Italy at that time who longed for Ottoman rule. They
wished they could be granted the same freedom and tolerance that the Ottomans
gave to their Christian subjects, for they had despaired of achieving it under
any Christian government. He also mentions that a great many Jews fled persecution
in Spain at the end of the 15th century and took refuge in Ottoman Turkey.
It is worthwhile to reemphasize the following point. The
existence of non-Muslims for centuries across the Muslim world, from Moorish
Spain and Sub-Saharan Africa to Egypt, Syria, India, and Indonesia are clear evidence of the religious tolerance extended by Islam to people of other faiths.
This tolerance even led to the elimination of Muslims, such as in Spain, where the remaining Christians took advantage of Muslim weakness, attacked them, and wiped
them out from Spain by either killing them, forcing them to convert, or
expulsion. Etienne Denier wrote, ‘The Muslims are the opposite of what many
people believe. They never used force outside of the Hejaz.
The presence of Christians was evidence of this fact. They retained their
religion in complete security during the eight centuries that the Muslims ruled
their lands. Some of them held high posts in the palace in Cordoba, but when
the same Christians obtained power over the country, suddenly their first
concern was to exterminate Muslims.’
|
