|
Although much less complicated and tedious that Jewish Keshrut,
or Jewish dietary laws, Islam does legislate certain rules and regulation in
regards to diet. All legislations which deal with this worldly life in Islam
are based upon the precept of maximizing benefits and reducing harm, and if the
harm of anything exceeds the benefits that might be gained from it, it is
generally prohibited in Islam. God says:
“They ask you about wine and gambling. Say: In them is much
sin, and also some benefit for people. But its sin is greater than its benefit...”
(Quran 2:219)
For this reason, Islam has mandated certain observances
in regards to the slaughter of animals to benefit from their meat, and these
mandates are legislated due to an intrinsic harm which would result if they
were not to be followed, most of which deal with health, as well as alleviating
pain inflicted upon the animal.
The Islamic Method of Slaughtering
One of the main legislations in regards to the
permissibility of meat is that it must be slaughtered according to the mandates
of the religion. Forbidden is any type of animal if it dies of natural cause,
strangulation, due to a violent blow, a headlong fall, by the goring of horns,
and that which has been partially eaten by wild animals. Rather, in order for
meat to be made permissible to eat, it must be slaughtered by a cut through the
neck, reaching through the trachea, esophagus, the jugular veins and carotid
arteries, without severing the spinal cord.
This method is indeed the most humane method to
slaughter an animal to make use of its meat. This is also the only method
endorsed by the congress of the United States of America, as mentioned in
section 1901 and 1902 (b), Chapter 48, Title 7, in which is written the
following:
The Congress
finds that the use of humane methods in the slaughter of livestock prevents
needless suffering; results in safer and better working conditions for persons
engaged in the slaughtering industry; brings about improvement of products and
economies in slaughtering operations; and produces other benefits for
producers, processors, and consumers which tend to expedite an orderly flow of
livestock and livestock products in interstate and foreign commerce. It is
therefore declared to be the policy of the United States that the slaughtering
of livestock and the handling of livestock in connection with slaughter shall
be carried out only by humane methods.
No method of
slaughtering or handling in connection with slaughtering shall be deemed to
comply with the public policy of the United States unless it is humane. Either
of the following two methods of slaughtering and handling are hereby found to
be humane:
(a) in the case of cattle, calves, horses,
mules, sheep, swine, and other livestock, all animals are rendered insensible
to pain by a single blow or gunshot or an electrical, chemical or other means
that is rapid and effective, before being shackled, hoisted, thrown, cast, or
cut; or
(b) by slaughtering in accordance with the
ritual requirements of the Jewish faith or any other religious faith that
prescribes a method of slaughter whereby the animal suffers loss of
consciousness by anemia of the brain caused by the simultaneous and
instantaneous severance of the carotid arteries with a sharp instrument and
handling in connection with such slaughtering.
As can be seen above, this method of slaughtering
ensures the least amount of pain is felt by the animal at the same time
rendering the meat safe to eat. The swift cutting of vessels of the neck
disconnects the flow of blood to the nerves in the brain responsible for pain,
and thus the animal does not feel pain. The movements and withering that happen
to the animal after the cut is made are not due to pain, but due to the
contraction and relaxation of the muscles deficient in blood. This movement is
also essential in forcing the maximum amount of blood from the body, which is
extremely important in order to purify the meat, as remaining blood acts as a
medium for microorganisms, in addition to meat remaining fresher for a longer
period of time. Also crucial to this factor is the severance of the trachea,
esophagus, and the jugular veins in conjunction with the carotid arteries,
which cause a rapid gush of blood to flow from the system. Severance of the
spinal cord, however, may lead to cardiac arrest, causing the stagnation of
blood in the blood vessels due to the damage of nerve fibers leading to the
heart.
Does the Animal Feel Pain in This Method?
In a study entitled Attempts to Objectify Pain and
Consciousness in Conventional (captive bolt pistol stunning) and Ritual (halal,
knife) Methods of Slaughtering Sheep and Calves’, carried out by Professor
Wilhelm Schulze and his colleague Dr. Hazim at the School of Veterinary
Medicine, Hanover University, Germany, several electrodes were surgically
implanted at various points of the skull of all animals, touching the surface
of the brain. After the animals were allowed to recover for several weeks,
some animals were slaughtered in the Islamic manner mentioned previously, by
the cutting of the trachea, esophagus, the jugular veins and carotid arteries.
Other animals were stunned first before slaughtering. During the experiment,
an electroencephalograph (EEG) and an electrocardiogram (ECG) recorded the
condition of the brain and the heart of all animals during the course of
slaughter and stunning. The following results were recorded:
1. The first three seconds from the time of
Islamic slaughter as recorded on the EEG did not show any change from the graph
before slaughter, thus indicating that the animal did not feel any pain during
or immediately after the incision.
2. For the following 3 seconds, the EEG recorded
a condition of deep sleep - unconsciousness. This is due to the large quantity
of blood gushing out from the body.
3. After the above-mentioned 6 seconds, the EEG
recorded zero level, showing no feeling of pain at all.
4. As the brain message (EEG) dropped to zero
level, the heart was still pounding and the body convulsing vigorously (a
reflex action of the spinal cord) driving a maximum amount of blood from the
body thus resulting in hygienic meat for the consumer.
|