El artículo / video que has solicitado no existe todavía.

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

Статьи / видео вы запросили еще не существует.

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

您所请求的文章/视频尚不存在。

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

あなたが要求した記事/ビデオはまだ存在していません。

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

L'articolo / video che hai richiesto non esiste ancora.

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

요청한 문서 / 비디오는 아직 존재하지 않습니다.

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

המאמר / הסרטון שביקשת אינו קיים עדיין.

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

El artículo / video que has solicitado no existe todavía.

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

Статьи / видео вы запросили еще не существует.

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

您所请求的文章/视频尚不存在。

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

L'articolo / video che hai richiesto non esiste ancora.

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

요청한 문서 / 비디오는 아직 존재하지 않습니다.

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

המאמר / הסרטון שביקשת אינו קיים עדיין.

The article/video you have requested doesn't exist yet.

Denying God, Denying Reality: Why We Donít Need Evidence for God (part 1 of 3)

Rating:   
Font size:

Description: The existence of God does not require evidence.† Part 1 discusses that belief in God is a self-evident truth and self-evident truths are cross-cultural, innate and provide the basis for a coherent worldview.

  • By Hamza Andreas Tzortzis
  • Published on 29 Dec 2014
  • Last modified on 01 Jun 2015
  • Printed: 65
  • Viewed: 13763 (daily average: 15)
  • Rating: 5 out of 5
  • Rated by: 3
  • Emailed: 0
  • Commented on: 0

Denying_God_01.jpgDoes God exist? This is the question Iíve constantly discussed with Atheist academics.† The discussion is often put forward in different guises but the premise is always the same; does God exist and what evidence is there to support this belief?

In fact, I would argue that we donít need any evidence for Godís existence.† So the question itself needs debating.† It shouldnít actually be "does God exist?", but rather "what reasons do we have to reject His existence?"

Now, donít get me wrong, I believe we have many good arguments which support a belief in God.† The point I am raising here, however, is that we donít require any evidence for His existence: God is an axiomatic belief.† In other words, Godís existence is self-evidently true.† Also known as a Ďbasic beliefí in the language of philosophy.

The idea of self-evident truths are accepted by all.† Take science for example: science takes the worldís reality as a self-evident truth; it believes that the world is real.† In other words, the physical world is separate and external from our minds and our thoughts.

So you may be thinking, ĎI believe that the real world is real, as I can touch and feel it.† I believe the world is real because other people also say that the world is as tangible to them as it is to me.í

However, this doesnít prove anything.† Touching and feeling something doesnít prove that what you touch and feel is external to your mind.† The thinking and feeling could simply be happening by the workings of your brain.† Consider this; maybe your brain is in a jar on the Moon.† There is an alien who has placed probes in it, who is making you think and feel what youíre feeling right now.

You donít actually have substantial evidence for the reality of the world you experience.† Evidence based on experience is unreliable as the experience could simply be produced in the brain.† Evidence based on philosophy or complex logic is also a product of the mind.† The external world may have no real existence apart from what is going on in your skull.

On reading this you may demand proof, proof that the real world is external to the brainÖ but we donít have any proof.† Actually, we donít need it.† Thatís why we call the belief in the real world an axiom, a self-evident truth or a basic belief.† Therefore, I would argue, that rejecting Godís existence is equivalent to rejecting that the world is real because they are both self-evident truths.

This is not a type of special pleading for God because there are a myriad of other self-evident truths and axioms that we believe in.† These include:

ē        The existence of other minds

ē        The existence of objective moral values

ē        The existence of logical truths

ē        The validity of our reasoning

ē        The law of causality

Self-evident truths, axioms and basic beliefs are cross cultural in that they are not culturally bound.† They are also innate in that they are not acquired via any form of information transfer, and they are also foundational.† What is meant by foundational is that they provide the basis for a coherent worldview.† These aspects of self-evident truths will be explained further while addressing the key objections to this argument.

Objection #1: What about the great pumpkin, or the spaghetti monster?

There are some objections to this argument.† Some atheists and sceptics will say: ĎWhat about the great pumpkin, or the spaghetti monster?í They highlight that if God is a self-evident truth, if God is axiomatic, then why canít the spaghetti monster, or the great pumpkin be self-evident truths as well?

There are three ways of dealing with this false contention:

1.††† A Cross Cultural Belief: The Ďspaghetti monsterí and the Ďgreat pumpkiní are not natural tendencies.[1]† There is not a broad natural tendency to believe in a Ďspaghetti monsterí or Ďgreat pumpkiní.† These are not natural tendencies, they are culturally bound.† For example, if I believe in a spaghetti monster, I would have to have been brought up in a culture in which you are taught about spaghetti and monsters.† However, the idea of God, the basic underlying idea of a creator, of a supernatural cause for the universe, is cross-cultural.† It is not contingent on culture but transcends it, just like the belief in causality and the existence of other minds.

2.††† An Innate Belief: Properly basic beliefs, axiomatic beliefs, and self-evident truths, do not require information transfer.† For me to understand what a spaghetti monster is, I require information to be transferred to me.† For example, I require knowledge of western cuisine and Italian culture.† But when it comes to the idea of Godís existence as the creator of the universe, you do not require any information transfer, whether from culture, or education.† This is why sociologists and anthropologists argue that even if atheist children were stranded on a desert island, they would come to believe that something created the desert island.[2]

††††† This is very critical to understand because we frequently hear ĎGod is no different than believing in the spaghetti monsterí.† This is not true.† If you understand self-evident truths, axiomatic and basic beliefs then you would see that they do not require information transfer.† The basic concept of God does not require information transfer.† The idea that monsters exist, or even that spaghetti exists, requires information transfer.† Therefore the spaghetti monster is not a self-evident truth.

3.††† A Foundational Belief: The third point is that basic and axiomatic beliefs are foundational: they provide a basis for a coherent world view.† They answer questions and facilitate knowledge.† For example, Godís existence, explains conscious emergence, the fact that we have consciousness within a material world.[3] †It answers the questions for which we have no answer, like the question of language.† Currently, evolutionary paradigms canít explain the development of language.[4]† It also explains the existence of objective moral truths and offers a foundation for explaining why things happen.

Letís apply this to another self-evident truth: the validity of our reasoning.† Trusting our minds and the very fact that we can reason to the truth is a basic belief.† If we did not hold such a belief then how could we trust our minds? How could we reason to the truth? How could we understand the universe and ourselves? These questions are indicative of the foundational nature of the validity of our reasoning.

Godís existence provides a foundation for a coherent world view, facilitates knowledge and answers key fundamental questions.† A belief in the spaghetti monster or the belief in the great pumpkin, only provides the foundation for a few laughs.



Footnotes:

[1] Is Belief in God Properly Basic. Alvin Plantinga. NoŻs. Vol. 15, No. 1, 1981 A. P. A. Western Division Meetings (Mar., 1981), pp. 41-51. You can find the journal online here: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2215239.

 

[2] BBC Radio 4 Today, 24 November 2008 http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_7745000/7745514.stm.† Accessed 17 December 2014.

[3] For more on this please read "Consciousness and the New Scientist Magazine", Hamza Andreas Tzortzis, 2014.† http://www.iera.org/research/essays-articles/consciousness-and-the-new-scientist-magazine-reflections-on-false-materialist-assumptions-hamza-tzortzis.† Accessed 17 December 2014.

[4] "This highlights an important and difficult challenge facing the study of language evolution: the need for cooperation between different disciplines and between researchers working on different aspects of the problem.† Without this cooperation a satisfactory account of the evolution of human language, and therefore of human language itself, is likely to be elusive." ([Prefinal Draft] Kirby, S.† (2007).† The evolution of language.† In Dunbar, R.† and Barrett, L., editors, Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, pp.† 669Ė681.† Oxford University Press.)

Parts of This Article

View all parts together

Add a comment

Other Articles in the Same Category

Other Videos in the Same Category

Most Viewed

DAILY
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
TOTAL
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)

Editorís Pick

(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)

List Articles

Since your last visit
This list is currently empty.
All by date
(Read more...)
(Read more...)

Most Popular

Highest rated
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
Most emailed
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
Most printed
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
Most commented on
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)
(Read more...)

Your Favorites

Your favorites list is empty.  You may add articles to this list using the article tools.

Your History

Your history list is empty.

View Desktop Version